🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 983+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Antique Cufflinks

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.4 out of 5(983 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$23.42
$39.03
Sale
βœ“ gratis dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage Brown Round Faceted Crystal Gold Tone Wrap Around CufflinksVintage 60's

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
instantaneous Shipping
↩️
elementary Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Antique Cufflinks

Vintage Brown Round Faceted Crystal Gold Tone Wrap Around Cufflinks

Vintage 60's​

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 867773

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Cuff Links

Original Price:$39.03 USD

Sale Price:$23.42 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary shipment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3766 reviews

AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
magnificent Antique Cufflinks!
truly satisfied with my Antique Cufflinks.
39 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell
4 months ago Β· Atlanta, GA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceeded expectations
Personally, the Antique Cufflinks feels solid and I don’t regret it. Packaging was basic.
24 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase​
9 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Fantastic product
Personally, the Antique Cufflinks works well enough and I don’t regret it.
37 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Cleveland, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Really terrific
From my experience, it works well enough which feels reasonable. Nothing fancy.
9 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green
1 week ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Couldn't be happier
After some use, it is hassle-on the house to use which is good enough.
16 people found this helpful